Visual Communication

To contact us Click HERE
There are deaf/hh people I know who grew up with SEE with their parents learning the English visual language. I'd say those deaf kids were lucky to have parents willing to sign as part of the visual communication effort than to rely on audition alone (i.e. speaking/listening). The oral and aural route may be a difficult route to take even though many kids have fared well while others didn't and that signing would've been helpful.  It also could have easily been no signing (ie. SEE, ASL, PSE, manual alphabet, LOVE, etc) whatsoever with no visual form of communication (including CUED speech) and just rely on their hearing aids only and do the whole oral/aural gambit instead. But luckily for them a visual language (e.g. SEE) was used to communicate and thus a foundation was indeed built. It may or may not have been a solid foundation but at least a foundation nonetheless.

Many SEE kids who are now adults show their gratefulness for their parents' contribution on establishing a visual communication effort with them. It could've been a lot worse. It could've been no signing at all.  Although I noticed some adults who grew up with SEE developed a certain disdain towards their own upbringing by their parents on the SEE usage simply because their parents didn't use ASL in the first place. How droll. How about at least show some kind of gratitude instead of being a snotty person about the whole affair and stop with this misguided anger towards parents for providing SEE instead of ASL? Signing in SEE became a familiar affair for those growing up with English visual language and because of that it helped those make the transition over from SEE to PSE or to ASL in a much more familiar environment as opposed to deaf/hh people who have never signed in SEE, PSE or ASL at all.

Be thankful you were exposed very early to SEE which is visual form of the English language rather than having no visual language at all.

Just ...... stop whining about SEE.